RMBKX vs. FLC
RMBKX (RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund) and FLC (Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX returned 11.00%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for FLC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMBKX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for FLC.
Performance
RMBKX vs. FLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than FLC's -1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX has outperformed FLC with an annualized return of 11.00%, while FLC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return.
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 38.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
FLC
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
RMBKX vs. FLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 12.74% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | -1.76% | 12.38% | 23.05% | -0.83% | -25.11% | 2.82% | 14.12% | 38.65% | -14.14% | 17.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBKX and FLC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.23 |
The correlation between RMBKX and FLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBKX vs. FLC — Risk / Return Rank
RMBKX
FLC
RMBKX vs. FLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBKX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 0.81 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 2.50 | +8.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBKX vs. FLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum FLC drawdown of -76.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and FLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBKX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -76.79% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -8.34% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | -11.87% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.33% | -40.14% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.45% | -55.27% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -5.16% | +3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -10.85% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.68% | +0.86% |
Volatility
RMBKX vs. FLC - Volatility Comparison
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc (FLC) at 1.76%. This indicates that RMBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBKX | FLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 1.76% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 6.13% | +7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 7.21% | +13.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 14.07% | +10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 22.04% | +5.13% |
RMBKX vs. FLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FLC's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMBKX vs. FLC - Dividend Comparison
RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, less than FLC's 7.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLC Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund Inc | 7.44% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.38% | 8.95% | 6.86% | 6.27% | 6.31% | 8.34% | 7.22% | 8.20% | 8.51% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 5.52% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBKX and FLC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBKX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to FLC (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBKX dropped -55.45% vs FLC's -76.79%.
RMBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBKX and FLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer