PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFPAX vs. FAFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SFPAX has underperformed FAFCX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while FAFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


SFPAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
8.74%

FAFCX

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
2.34%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFPAX
Saratoga Financial Service Fund
0.00%7.00%26.05%10.58%-14.36%31.17%-5.81%29.63%-19.23%19.28%
FAFCX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C
-2.54%14.05%37.55%13.19%-9.63%31.91%-1.00%32.80%-16.73%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between SFPAX and FAFCX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.95

Over the past year, the correlation between SFPAX and FAFCX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.95, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFPAX vs. FAFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFPAX
SFPAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SFPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SFPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FAFCX
FAFCX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFPAXFAFCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

0.78

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.10

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.61

+1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.64

1.73

+2.91

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the FAFCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFPAX and FAFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFPAXFAFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.51

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.46

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.52

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.26

-0.13

Drawdowns

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFPAX drawdown since its inception was -71.98%, smaller than the maximum FAFCX drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFPAX and FAFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFPAXFAFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.98%

-76.00%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-13.19%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-19.53%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-25.75%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.64%

-46.01%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-5.49%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-18.80%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

4.64%

-2.37%

Volatility

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) is 0.00%, while Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that SFPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFPAXFAFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.43%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

11.81%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

15.90%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

21.01%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.64%

23.81%

-1.17%

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFPAX has a 3.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FAFCX's 1.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFPAX vs. FAFCX - Dividend Comparison

SFPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFCX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C
6.84%6.67%9.04%1.58%5.50%3.78%1.85%0.45%3.33%0.00%0.01%0.28%
SFPAX
Saratoga Financial Service Fund
0.00%0.00%5.91%5.05%5.71%5.03%4.18%7.10%22.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFPAX and FAFCX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAFCX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to SFPAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFPAX dropped -71.98% vs FAFCX's -76.00%.

SFPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFPAX and FAFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer