FAFCX vs. LSGRX
FAFCX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C) and LSGRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FAFCX is a Financials Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while LSGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis. Over the past 10 years, FAFCX returned 13.60%/yr vs 15.08%/yr for LSGRX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FAFCX charges 1.79%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for LSGRX.
Performance
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAFCX achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly higher than LSGRX's -6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FAFCX has underperformed LSGRX with an annualized return of 13.60%, while LSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.
FAFCX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.27%
LSGRX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -1.65%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | 9.18% | 14.05% | 37.55% | 13.19% | -9.63% | 31.91% | -1.00% | 32.80% | -16.73% | 19.64% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -6.38% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAFCX and LSGRX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1996 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAFCX and LSGRX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAFCX vs. LSGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FAFCX
LSGRX
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) and Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAFCX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | -0.12 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | -0.32 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAFCX drawdown since its inception was -76.00%, which is greater than LSGRX's maximum drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFCX and LSGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAFCX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.00% | -63.63% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -17.83% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -27.33% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.75% | -34.69% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.01% | -34.69% | -11.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -9.51% | +8.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.71% | -17.91% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 6.33% | -1.68% |
Volatility
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C (FAFCX) is 4.82%, while Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that FAFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAFCX | LSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 5.34% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 13.82% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.22% | 18.11% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 22.90% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 20.98% | +2.81% |
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAFCX has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGRX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAFCX vs. LSGRX - Dividend Comparison
FAFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than LSGRX's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAFCX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class C | 6.11% | 6.67% | 9.04% | 1.58% | 5.50% | 3.78% | 1.85% | 0.45% | 3.33% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.28% |
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.37% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAFCX and LSGRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGRX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to FAFCX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAFCX dropped -76.00% vs LSGRX's -63.63%.
FAFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAFCX and LSGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer