SFPAX vs. ECAT
SFPAX (Saratoga Financial Service Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - SFPAX is a Financials Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, SFPAX returned 15.10%/yr vs 17.59%/yr for ECAT. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SFPAX charges 3.81%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFPAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.28%
ECAT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.46M | $7.38M | $7.72M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 7.00% | 26.05% | 10.58% | -14.36% | -0.27% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 10.45% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFPAX and ECAT is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SFPAX and ECAT has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFPAX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
SFPAX
ECAT
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFPAX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.17 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.16 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 4.22 | -4.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFPAX drawdown since its inception was -71.98%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFPAX and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFPAX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.98% | -32.23% | -39.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -11.80% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.92% | -15.79% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -4.28% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -8.86% | -12.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.24% | -0.92% |
Volatility
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) is 0.00%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that SFPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFPAX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.75% | -3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 11.27% | -9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.20% | 14.17% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 16.82% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 16.82% | +5.69% |
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFPAX has a 3.81% expense ratio, which is higher than ECAT's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFPAX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
SFPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 22.31% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% | 5.05% | 5.71% | 5.03% | 4.18% | 7.10% | 22.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFPAX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to SFPAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFPAX dropped -71.98% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
ECAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFPAX and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer