SFLO vs. IBIC
SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFLO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SFLO returned 32.02% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
SFLO vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.
SFLO
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLO vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 13.58% | 11.88% | 6.54% | -0.16% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLO and IBIC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023 | 0.03 |
The correlation between SFLO and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLO vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
SFLO
IBIC
SFLO vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLO | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 2.24 | -0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 17.27 | -13.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.73 | 67.45 | -53.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLO | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 5.05 | -3.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 3.49 | -2.85 |
Drawdowns
SFLO vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLO | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -0.90% | -25.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -0.26% | -7.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.70% | -0.13% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -0.10% | -4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 0.07% | +2.27% |
Volatility
SFLO vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLO | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 0.33% | +4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 0.67% | +10.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.30% | 0.90% | +16.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 1.58% | +18.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 1.58% | +18.97% |
SFLO vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLO vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.85% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFLO and IBIC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFLO has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 32.02% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SFLO.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.85% for SFLO.
SFLO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLO and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer