PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLO vs. BBSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLO vs. BBSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than BBSC's 15.75% return.


SFLO

1D
-1.52%
1M
1.28%
YTD
13.58%
6M
12.24%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBSC

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.71%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.20%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLO vs. BBSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
13.58%11.88%6.54%-0.16%
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
15.75%10.38%12.31%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and BBSC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023

0.84

The correlation between SFLO and BBSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFLO vs. BBSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFLO
BBSC

Technology

25.6%
18.5%

Healthcare

18.0%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
9.0%

Energy

14.8%
6.4%

Industrials

10.5%
14.9%

Communication Services

7.3%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.1%

Financial Services

0.3%
16.9%

Utilities

0.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
7.7%

Technology

SFLO
25.6%
BBSC
18.5%

Healthcare

SFLO
18.0%
BBSC
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SFLO
16.9%
BBSC
9.0%

Energy

SFLO
14.8%
BBSC
6.4%

Industrials

SFLO
10.5%
BBSC
14.9%

Communication Services

SFLO
7.3%
BBSC
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SFLO
5.1%
BBSC
3.2%

Basic Materials

SFLO
1.6%
BBSC
4.1%

Financial Services

SFLO
0.3%
BBSC
16.9%

Utilities

SFLO
0.1%
BBSC
1.2%

Real Estate

SFLO
0.1%
BBSC
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLO vs. BBSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO
SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. BBSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLOBBSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

3.79

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.73

12.35

+1.37

SFLO vs. BBSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BBSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and BBSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLOBBSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.90

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.49

+0.16

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. BBSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum BBSC drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and BBSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLOBBSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-30.96%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-9.54%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-1.48%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-11.49%

+7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.92%

-0.58%

Volatility

SFLO vs. BBSC - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) at 4.91%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLOBBSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.91%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

12.98%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

19.12%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

22.93%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.55%

22.86%

-2.31%

SFLO vs. BBSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFLO vs. BBSC - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than BBSC's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
0.85%1.04%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFLO and BBSC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFLO has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to BBSC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs BBSC's -30.96%.

On 1-year performance, BBSC leads with 35.98% vs 32.02% for SFLO. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 35.98% return vs 32.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SFLO.

BBSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.85% for SFLO.

SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.09% for BBSC.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLO and BBSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer