PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. SWOBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
2.71%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
SWOBX
Schwab Balanced Fund™
-2.85%12.76%12.51%18.25%-18.86%14.76%14.73%20.13%-4.35%15.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly higher than SWOBX's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed SWOBX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while SWOBX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
1.98%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
2.71%
6M
6.30%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.25%

SWOBX

1D
2.00%
1M
-4.03%
YTD
-2.85%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
11.81%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
8.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWOBX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. SWOBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SWOBX
SWOBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SWOBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWOBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWOBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SWOBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWOBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLNXSWOBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

1.07

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.62

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.67

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

7.16

+1.06

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the SWOBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and SWOBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLNXSWOBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.07

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.40

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.63

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.58

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and SWOBX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SWOBX's 5.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.63%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWOBX
Schwab Balanced Fund™
5.64%5.47%4.94%5.67%10.21%6.47%2.97%5.21%7.11%3.20%7.83%7.66%

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than SWOBX's maximum drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and SWOBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXSWOBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-35.99%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-7.36%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-28.30%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-28.30%

-9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-4.72%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-6.25%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

1.72%

+0.84%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. SWOBX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) have volatilities of 4.01% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXSWOBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.13%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

6.62%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

11.38%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

13.94%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

12.84%

+5.57%