SFGV vs. WDIV
SFGV (Sequoia Global Value ETF) and WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SFGV is actively managed, while WDIV is passively managed. Over the past year, SFGV returned 24.39% vs 19.92% for WDIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFGV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDIV.
Performance
SFGV vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFGV achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than WDIV's 7.89% return.
SFGV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 24.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
SFGV vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF | 11.40% | 18.84% | 11.04% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 7.89% | 27.16% | 11.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFGV and WDIV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SFGV and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFGV vs. WDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFGV
WDIV
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
SFGV
WDIV
Industrials
SFGV
WDIV
Healthcare
SFGV
WDIV
Energy
SFGV
WDIV
Technology
SFGV
WDIV
Financial Services
SFGV
WDIV
Consumer Defensive
SFGV
WDIV
Basic Materials
SFGV
WDIV
Real Estate
SFGV
WDIV
Communication Services
SFGV
WDIV
Utilities
SFGV
WDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFGV vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank
SFGV
WDIV
SFGV vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFGV | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.32 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 8.53 | +2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFGV vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFGV drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, smaller than the maximum WDIV drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFGV and WDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFGV | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | -42.34% | +27.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -8.61% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.94% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -5.83% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.34% | -0.10% |
Volatility
SFGV vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison
Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) at 3.05%. This indicates that SFGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFGV | WDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.05% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 8.32% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 10.29% | +1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 12.77% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 15.24% | -1.99% |
SFGV vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFGV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFGV vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison
SFGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than WDIV's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF | 2.25% | 2.52% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.29% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFGV and WDIV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFGV has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to WDIV (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFGV dropped -14.51% vs WDIV's -42.34%.
On 1-year performance, SFGV leads with 24.39% vs 19.92% for WDIV. On fees, SFGV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SFGV has performed better with a 24.39% return vs 19.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFGV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 2.25% for SFGV.
They also come from different issuers: Sequoia and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for SFGV and 0.40% for WDIV.
SFGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFGV and WDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer