PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFCWX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFCWX achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than MBXIX's 12.91% return.


SFCWX

1D
2.72%
1M
-4.38%
6M
6.41%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
18.47%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.03%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3
10.23%14.49%2.72%19.34%-29.65%10.54%37.95%31.29%-9.45%11.61%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SFCWX and MBXIX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.51

The correlation between SFCWX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFCWX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SFCWX
SFCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SFCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SFCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFCWXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.88

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.07

14.92

-9.85

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFCWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFCWX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFCWX drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFCWX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFCWXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-31.73%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-3.85%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.30%

-15.59%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.54%

-15.59%

-23.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.25%

-2.68%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-3.95%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.04%

+2.22%

Volatility

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that SFCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFCWXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

1.59%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.97%

4.89%

+10.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

6.90%

+10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

11.40%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.58%

13.36%

+5.22%

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFCWX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFCWX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

SFCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%
SFCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3
4.60%5.10%0.98%0.98%0.34%9.05%1.58%4.19%7.01%4.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFCWX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFCWX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFCWX dropped -39.54% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFCWX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer