SFCWX vs. VB
SFCWX (American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - SFCWX is a Global Equities fund managed by American Funds, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, SFCWX returned 3.05%/yr vs 7.39%/yr for VB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFCWX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
SFCWX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SFCWX having a 16.06% return and VB slightly lower at 15.68%.
SFCWX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
VB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 30.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
SFCWX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 | 16.06% | 14.49% | 2.72% | 19.34% | -29.65% | 10.54% | 37.95% | 31.29% | -9.45% | 11.61% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.68% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFCWX and VB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SFCWX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFCWX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
SFCWX
VB
SFCWX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFCWX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.38 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 12.38 | -2.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFCWX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFCWX drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFCWX and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFCWX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.54% | -59.56% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -8.98% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.30% | -25.36% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.54% | -28.15% | -11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.39% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.38% | -8.42% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.44% | +0.53% |
Volatility
SFCWX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 (SFCWX) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that SFCWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFCWX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 4.92% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.95% | 12.21% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 16.66% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 20.78% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 21.45% | -2.88% |
SFCWX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFCWX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFCWX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
SFCWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFCWX American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class F-3 | 4.37% | 5.10% | 0.98% | 0.98% | 0.34% | 9.05% | 1.58% | 4.19% | 7.01% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SFCWX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SFCWX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFCWX dropped -39.54% vs VB's -59.56%.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFCWX and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer