PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEVAX vs. FMUEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEVAX achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than FMUEX's 19.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SEVAX has underperformed FMUEX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while FMUEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


SEVAX

1D
0.57%
1M
0.13%
6M
6.93%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
6.01%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
8.53%
ALL TIME*
11.30%

FMUEX

1D
0.32%
1M
0.19%
6M
13.67%
YTD
19.59%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
11.41%7.18%-1.97%9.34%-2.07%23.63%3.56%26.83%-13.22%13.38%
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
19.59%12.79%8.09%17.10%-10.47%31.75%5.65%22.44%-11.62%13.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SEVAX and FMUEX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.94

The correlation between SEVAX and FMUEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEVAX vs. FMUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEVAX
SEVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SEVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SEVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUEX
FMUEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FMUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEVAXFMUEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.93

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

14.45

-8.20

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FMUEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEVAX and FMUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEVAX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum FMUEX drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEVAX and FMUEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEVAXFMUEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-58.03%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-7.61%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.86%

-25.49%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.86%

-25.49%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-42.31%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.38%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-8.01%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.07%

+0.45%

Volatility

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund (FMUEX) at 2.67%. This indicates that SEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEVAXFMUEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.67%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.85%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

14.16%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

18.27%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

19.66%

+0.93%

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUEX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEVAX vs. FMUEX - Dividend Comparison

SEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%, more than FMUEX's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUEX
RBB Free Market U.S. Equity Fund
1.57%1.87%0.00%4.12%8.26%4.38%1.61%5.57%5.88%3.80%4.80%8.51%
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
12.73%14.18%0.00%1.58%5.49%6.98%0.00%4.25%15.53%7.55%3.12%18.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SEVAX and FMUEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEVAX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FMUEX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEVAX dropped -50.99% vs FMUEX's -58.03%.

FMUEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEVAX and FMUEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer