PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEVAX vs. VMFVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEVAX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than VMFVX's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SEVAX has underperformed VMFVX with an annualized return of 8.66%, while VMFVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


SEVAX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.24%
YTD
9.53%
6M
7.69%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
8.66%

VMFVX

1D
0.89%
1M
3.13%
YTD
10.96%
6M
8.89%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
9.53%7.18%-1.97%9.34%-2.07%23.63%3.56%26.83%-13.22%13.38%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
10.96%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SEVAX and VMFVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.96

The correlation between SEVAX and VMFVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEVAX vs. VMFVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEVAX
SEVAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SEVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SEVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEVAXVMFVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.13

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

7.36

+0.33

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the VMFVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEVAX and VMFVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEVAX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than VMFVX's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEVAX and VMFVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEVAXVMFVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-45.79%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-10.52%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.86%

-22.46%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.86%

-22.46%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-45.79%

+2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-0.97%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-5.47%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.04%

-0.52%

Volatility

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) at 4.23%. This indicates that SEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEVAXVMFVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

4.23%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

10.68%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

15.25%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

19.45%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.69%

21.89%

-1.20%

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEVAX vs. VMFVX - Dividend Comparison

SEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%, more than VMFVX's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
12.95%14.18%0.00%1.58%5.49%6.98%0.00%4.25%15.53%7.55%3.12%18.23%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.70%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SEVAX and VMFVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEVAX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to VMFVX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEVAX dropped -50.99% vs VMFVX's -45.79%.

VMFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEVAX and VMFVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer