PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEVAX vs. RYMTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEVAX achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than RYMTX's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SEVAX has outperformed RYMTX with an annualized return of 8.59%, while RYMTX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.


SEVAX

1D
1.49%
1M
4.73%
YTD
9.94%
6M
10.09%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
8.59%

RYMTX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.75%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
9.94%7.18%-1.97%9.34%-2.07%23.63%3.56%26.83%-13.22%13.38%
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.95%5.52%0.56%3.62%14.75%2.62%2.07%7.18%-7.87%7.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SEVAX and RYMTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.17

The correlation between SEVAX and RYMTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEVAX vs. RYMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEVAX
SEVAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SEVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SEVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RYMTX
RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEVAXRYMTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.64

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.29

13.88

-5.59

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the RYMTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEVAX and RYMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEVAXRYMTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.49

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.35

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.10

+0.45

Drawdowns

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEVAX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than RYMTX's maximum drawdown of -34.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEVAX and RYMTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEVAXRYMTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-34.19%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-5.43%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.86%

-17.54%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.86%

-17.54%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-17.54%

-25.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.02%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.54%

-18.90%

+11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

1.42%

+1.10%

Volatility

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) at 1.72%. This indicates that SEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEVAXRYMTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

1.72%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

8.46%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.57%

11.10%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

12.15%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

10.65%

+10.01%

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMTX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEVAX vs. RYMTX - Dividend Comparison

SEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than RYMTX's 5.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.53%6.03%5.10%1.02%4.80%0.00%7.56%0.00%0.00%4.70%5.19%2.68%
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
12.90%14.18%0.00%1.58%5.49%6.98%0.00%4.25%15.53%7.55%3.12%18.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEVAX and RYMTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEVAX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to RYMTX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEVAX dropped -50.99% vs RYMTX's -34.19%.

RYMTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEVAX and RYMTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer