SEVAX vs. GOF
SEVAX (Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund) and GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - SEVAX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Guggenheim, while GOF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, SEVAX returned 8.52%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for GOF. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEVAX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for GOF.
Performance
SEVAX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEVAX achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SEVAX has outperformed GOF with an annualized return of 8.52%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.
SEVAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 19.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.28%
GOF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -9.44%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -15.54%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.95M | $14.31M | $15.46M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SEVAX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEVAX Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund | 10.95% | 7.18% | -1.97% | 9.34% | -2.07% | 23.63% | 3.56% | 26.83% | -13.22% | 13.38% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -8.87% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEVAX and GOF is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEVAX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank
SEVAX
GOF
SEVAX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEVAX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.84 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | -0.68 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.68 | -1.12 | +7.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEVAX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEVAX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum GOF drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEVAX and GOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEVAX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -54.66% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -23.24% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.86% | -28.56% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.86% | -32.41% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.16% | -38.50% | -4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -18.83% | +17.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -7.15% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 14.14% | -11.65% |
Volatility
SEVAX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) at 2.66%. This indicates that SEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEVAX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 2.66% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 10.62% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 18.23% | -4.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 18.18% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 19.53% | +1.07% |
SEVAX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEVAX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison
SEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.78%, less than GOF's 20.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 20.79% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
SEVAX Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund | 12.78% | 14.18% | 0.00% | 1.58% | 5.49% | 6.98% | 0.00% | 4.25% | 15.53% | 7.55% | 3.12% | 18.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEVAX and GOF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEVAX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to GOF (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEVAX dropped -50.99% vs GOF's -54.66%.
SEVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEVAX and GOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer