PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEVAX vs. ARFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEVAX achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than ARFFX's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SEVAX has underperformed ARFFX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while ARFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.


SEVAX

1D
0.57%
1M
0.13%
6M
6.93%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
6.01%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
8.53%
ALL TIME*
11.30%

ARFFX

1D
1.79%
1M
3.49%
6M
5.86%
YTD
14.20%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
10.40%
ALL TIME*
7.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
11.41%7.18%-1.97%9.34%-2.07%23.63%3.56%26.83%-13.22%13.38%
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
14.20%21.00%13.39%6.98%-9.12%21.14%6.90%25.62%-13.23%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SEVAX and ARFFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2005

0.88

The correlation between SEVAX and ARFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEVAX vs. ARFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEVAX
SEVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SEVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SEVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ARFFX
ARFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ARFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEVAXARFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.37

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

3.51

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

8.62

-2.37

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ARFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEVAX and ARFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEVAX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum ARFFX drawdown of -57.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEVAX and ARFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEVAXARFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.99%

-57.66%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-8.02%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.86%

-23.39%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.86%

-24.50%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.16%

-43.22%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-9.40%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.26%

-0.74%

Volatility

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund (SEVAX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) have volatilities of 3.43% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEVAXARFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

3.43%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.16%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.92%

13.38%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

18.42%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

19.78%

+0.81%

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEVAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ARFFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEVAX vs. ARFFX - Dividend Comparison

SEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%, more than ARFFX's 11.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
11.11%12.68%2.27%3.33%8.30%3.30%2.41%1.03%7.61%5.76%1.04%13.91%
SEVAX
Guggenheim SMid Cap Value Fund
12.73%14.18%0.00%1.58%5.49%6.98%0.00%4.25%15.53%7.55%3.12%18.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEVAX and ARFFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARFFX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to SEVAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEVAX dropped -50.99% vs ARFFX's -57.66%.

ARFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEVAX and ARFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer