PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARFFX vs. AINTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) and Ariel International Fund (AINTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARFFX achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than AINTX's 18.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ARFFX has outperformed AINTX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while AINTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.62% annualized return.


ARFFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.37%
YTD
8.39%
6M
7.53%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
10.35%

AINTX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.47%
YTD
18.75%
6M
19.57%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
7.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
8.39%21.00%13.39%6.98%-9.12%21.14%6.90%25.62%-13.23%15.01%
AINTX
Ariel International Fund
18.75%31.39%5.23%10.02%-11.33%4.31%6.84%12.83%-9.82%16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ARFFX and AINTX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.57

The correlation between ARFFX and AINTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARFFX vs. AINTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARFFX
ARFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ARFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

AINTX
AINTX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AINTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AINTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) and Ariel International Fund (AINTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARFFXAINTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

2.28

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

8.24

+2.40

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the AINTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARFFX and AINTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARFFX drawdown since its inception was -57.66%, which is greater than AINTX's maximum drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARFFX and AINTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARFFXAINTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.66%

-27.95%

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-12.93%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-14.23%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-25.31%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

-27.95%

-15.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-0.52%

-3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-5.54%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.57%

-0.39%

Volatility

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) is 4.18%, while Ariel International Fund (AINTX) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that ARFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AINTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARFFXAINTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

5.95%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

13.33%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

15.76%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

14.43%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

13.74%

+6.14%

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARFFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AINTX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

ARFFX vs. AINTX - Dividend Comparison

ARFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, less than AINTX's 12.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AINTX
Ariel International Fund
12.81%15.21%6.28%1.64%0.00%2.54%1.47%1.59%1.17%1.76%1.69%0.20%
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
11.70%12.68%2.27%3.33%8.30%3.30%2.41%1.03%7.61%5.76%1.04%13.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARFFX and AINTX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AINTX has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to ARFFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARFFX dropped -57.66% vs AINTX's -27.95%.

ARFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARFFX and AINTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer