SENT vs. LSEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) and LSEQ (Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. SENT is passively managed, while LSEQ is actively managed. Over the past year, SENT returned 0.00% vs 25.44% for LSEQ. SENT charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for LSEQ.

Performance

SENT vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

LSEQ

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 27.40%
• 6M: 26.84%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	27.40%	4.13%	12.80%	-1.20%

SENT vs. LSEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SENT	LSEQ
Technology	26.2%	-10.9%
Healthcare	24.8%	14.7%
Industrials	14.6%	6.5%
Energy	10.3%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	17.3%
Financial Services	6.1%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	5.2%
Basic Materials	3.0%	27.3%
Communication Services	1.9%	7.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

SENT vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEQ

LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENT vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	LSEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	1.19	-1.44

Drawdowns

SENT vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than LSEQ's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and LSEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	LSEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	-8.35%	-21.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-7.40%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-1.66%	-25.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.90%	-3.23%	-17.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	2.78%	-2.78%

Volatility

SENT vs. LSEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SENT	LSEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	5.48%	-5.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	12.75%	-12.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	15.09%	-15.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	14.32%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	14.32%	-1.00%

SENT vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SENT vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%.

Position	TTM	2025
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	1.73%	2.20%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, SENT or LSEQ?

LSEQ has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENT dropped -30.34% vs LSEQ's -8.35%.

Which ETF is better, SENT or LSEQ?

On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 25.44% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SENT or LSEQ?

Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 25.44% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SENT or LSEQ?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SENT or LSEQ?

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between SENT and LSEQ?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SENT and 1.70% for LSEQ.