LSEQ vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC).

LSEQ is an actively managed fund by Harbor. It was launched on Dec 4, 2023.

Performance

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	22.47%	4.13%	12.80%	-1.20%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-3.95%	16.39%	23.31%	4.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSEQ achieves a 22.47% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.

LSEQ

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 22.47%
• 6M: 23.09%
• 1Y: 19.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEQ

LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 67
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSEQ	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.92	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	1.41	+0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.41	+1.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.80	6.61	-1.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSEQ and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSEQ	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.92	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.46	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between LSEQ and ^GSPC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSEQ	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.35%	-56.78%	+48.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.40%	-12.14%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-5.78%	+4.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-10.75%	+7.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	2.60%	+1.48%

Volatility

LSEQ vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSEQ	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	5.37%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	9.55%	+3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.93%	18.33%	-2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	16.90%	-2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	18.05%	-3.80%