SENT vs. HEFT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) and HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) are both Long-Short funds. SENT is passively managed, while HEFT is actively managed. SENT charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HEFT.

Performance

SENT vs. HEFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

HEFT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. HEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	7.91%	0.98%

Return for Risk

SENT vs. HEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	HEFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	1.44	-1.69

Drawdowns

SENT vs. HEFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than HEFT's maximum drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and HEFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	HEFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	-9.17%	-21.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-2.64%	-24.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.90%	-3.13%	-17.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SENT	HEFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	12.53%	-12.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	12.53%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	12.53%	+0.79%

SENT vs. HEFT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than HEFT's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

SENT vs. HEFT - Dividend Comparison

SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	0.02%	0.02%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SENT or HEFT?

On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SENT or HEFT?

HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SENT or HEFT?

HEFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between SENT and HEFT?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SENT and 0.70% for HEFT.