SEMG vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SEMG (Suncoast Select Growth ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Suncoast, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. SEMG is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, SEMG returned 0.01% vs 25.06% for ENFR. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. SEMG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

SEMG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMG achieves a -5.62% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.18% return.

SEMG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: -5.62%
• 6M: -6.47%
• 1Y: 0.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: -1.40%
• 1M: -5.86%
• YTD: 23.18%
• 6M: 23.40%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 28.30%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMG vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	-5.62%	7.89%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.18%	2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMG and ENFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	-0.11

SEMG vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEMG	ENFR
Technology	41.0%	-
Communication Services	18.4%	-
Financial Services	16.8%	0.1%
Healthcare	12.9%	-
Industrials	6.6%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	98.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

SEMG vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMG

SEMG Risk / Return Rank: 9
SEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
SEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
SEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 55
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEMG	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	1.69	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	2.35	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.29	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.00	2.91	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.00	7.39	-7.39

SEMG vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMG and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEMG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMG drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMG and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMG	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-68.28%	+52.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-8.64%	-7.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.56%	-6.04%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.44%	-15.93%	+12.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	3.40%	+1.67%

Volatility

SEMG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) is 4.46%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that SEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEMG	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	5.68%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	11.71%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	14.91%	-1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.21%	19.26%	-6.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	24.68%	-11.47%

SEMG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

SEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than ENFR's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.07%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	0.06%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMG and ENFR in my portfolio?

SEMG and ENFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEMG or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to SEMG (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMG dropped -15.80% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, SEMG or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 25.06% vs 0.01% for SEMG. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SEMG has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEMG or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEMG or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEMG or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.06% for SEMG.

What is the main difference between SEMG and ENFR?

SEMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Suncoast and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEMG and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.