SELV vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SELV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. SELV is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SELV returned 9.83%/yr vs 35.93%/yr for MTUM. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

SELV vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SELV achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 38.19% return.

SELV

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -4.10%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: 5.79%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTUM

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: 13.83%
• YTD: 38.19%
• 6M: 36.52%
• 1Y: 50.96%
• 3Y*: 35.93%
• 5Y*: 16.53%
• 10Y*: 18.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SELV vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	-0.78%	12.86%	14.71%	6.58%	-0.61%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	38.19%	22.15%	32.89%	9.15%	3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SELV and MTUM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between SELV and MTUM has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SELV vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SELV	MTUM
Technology	21.4%	50.2%
Healthcare	17.0%	3.5%
Communication Services	15.8%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	12.3%	3.7%
Utilities	7.6%	0.6%
Industrials	7.5%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	2.9%
Financial Services	4.8%	5.0%
Energy	4.3%	10.5%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.3%

Return for Risk

SELV vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SELV

SELV Risk / Return Rank: 20
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 22

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 79
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SELV vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SELV	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	2.39	-1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	3.10	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.43	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	4.44	-3.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	17.05	-14.35

SELV vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SELV Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SELV and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SELV vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SELV drawdown since its inception was -13.73%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SELV and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SELV	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.73%	-34.08%	+20.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.92%	-11.54%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.94%	-20.99%	+12.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.51%	0.00%	-5.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.37%	-6.19%	+3.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	3.00%	-0.85%

Volatility

SELV vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) is 2.91%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that SELV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SELV	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	11.02%	-8.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.68%	18.88%	-12.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.97%	21.48%	-12.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.89%	21.06%	-9.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.89%	21.28%	-9.39%

SELV vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SELV and MTUM have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SELV vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than MTUM's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.54%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	1.80%	1.74%	1.77%	2.06%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SELV and MTUM in my portfolio?

SELV and MTUM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SELV or MTUM?

MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to SELV (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SELV dropped -13.73% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

Which ETF is better, SELV or MTUM?

On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 35.93% vs 9.83% for SELV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SELV or MTUM?

Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 35.93% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SELV or MTUM?

SELV and MTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SELV or MTUM?

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.54% for MTUM.

What is the main difference between SELV and MTUM?

SELV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.