PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIS vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIS vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIS achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 13.60% return.


SEIS

1D
1.14%
1M
5.07%
YTD
18.31%
6M
14.78%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISCB

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.02%
YTD
13.60%
6M
10.99%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIS vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEIS
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
18.31%9.81%1.42%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
13.60%12.46%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIS and ISCB is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.95

The correlation between SEIS and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIS vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIS
SEIS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SEIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIS vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEISISCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.37

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

12.05

-1.99

SEIS vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIS and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIS vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIS drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIS and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEISISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-61.25%

+35.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-9.39%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-9.78%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.62%

+0.75%

Volatility

SEIS vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 4.50%. This indicates that SEIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEISISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

4.50%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

11.73%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

16.75%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

21.41%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

22.70%

-0.57%

SEIS vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIS vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

SEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than ISCB's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.30%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%
SEIS
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
0.36%0.59%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SEIS and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEIS has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to ISCB (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIS dropped -26.08% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 1-year performance, SEIS leads with 33.83% vs 31.54% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEIS has performed better with a 33.83% return vs 31.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SEIS.

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.36% for SEIS.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SEIS and 0.04% for ISCB.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIS and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer