PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIS vs. SEEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIS vs. SEEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIS achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly lower than SEEM's 34.03% return.


SEIS

1D
1.14%
1M
5.07%
YTD
18.31%
6M
14.78%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SEEM

1D
0.72%
1M
8.87%
YTD
34.03%
6M
36.33%
1Y
62.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIS vs. SEEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SEIS
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
18.31%9.81%1.42%
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
34.03%38.16%-6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIS and SEEM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.59

The correlation between SEIS and SEEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIS vs. SEEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIS
SEIS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SEIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEM
SEEM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIS vs. SEEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) and SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEISSEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.45

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

17.01

-6.95

SEIS vs. SEEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the SEEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIS and SEEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIS vs. SEEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIS drawdown since its inception was -26.08%, which is greater than SEEM's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIS and SEEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEISSEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-14.34%

-11.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-14.01%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-2.66%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

3.66%

-0.29%

Volatility

SEIS vs. SEEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) is 5.70%, while SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SEEM) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that SEIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEISSEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

10.34%

-4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

19.24%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

21.57%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

20.74%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

20.74%

+1.39%

SEIS vs. SEEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SEEM's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEIS vs. SEEM - Dividend Comparison

SEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SEEM's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SEEM
SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.37%3.31%0.31%
SEIS
SEI Select Small Cap ETF
0.36%0.59%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIS and SEEM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEEM has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to SEIS (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIS dropped -26.08% vs SEEM's -14.34%.

On 1-year performance, SEEM leads with 62.03% vs 33.83% for SEIS. On fees, SEIS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, SEIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEEM has performed better with a 62.03% return vs 33.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEEM.

SEEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.36% for SEIS.

SEIS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SEEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SEIS and 0.60% for SEEM.

SEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIS and SEEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer