PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIQ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIQ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIQ achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return.


SEIQ

1D
0.32%
1M
2.35%
6M
6.00%
YTD
6.22%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.90%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.13M$3.08M$2.14M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

SEIQ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
6.22%12.51%16.15%22.66%1.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIQ and VOO is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022

0.89

The correlation between SEIQ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SEIQ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEIQ
VOO

Technology

34.1%
38.6%

Healthcare

19.4%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
4.5%

Financial Services

10.3%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.5%

Industrials

6.7%
8.5%

Communication Services

5.3%
9.9%

Basic Materials

0.9%
1.7%

Energy

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

SEIQ
34.1%
VOO
38.6%

Healthcare

SEIQ
19.4%
VOO
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

SEIQ
13.1%
VOO
4.5%

Financial Services

SEIQ
10.3%
VOO
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SEIQ
10.0%
VOO
9.5%

Industrials

SEIQ
6.7%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

SEIQ
5.3%
VOO
9.9%

Basic Materials

SEIQ
0.9%
VOO
1.7%

Energy

SEIQ

-

VOO
3.0%

Real Estate

SEIQ

-

VOO
1.8%

Utilities

SEIQ

-

VOO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIQ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEIQ
SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEIQ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIQVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.21

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

9.44

-4.92

SEIQ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIQ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEIQ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIQVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-33.99%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-8.90%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-18.69%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.38%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-3.67%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.08%

+0.47%

Volatility

SEIQ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that SEIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIQVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.54%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

10.10%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

12.82%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

16.93%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

18.01%

-3.43%

SEIQ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEIQ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEIQ
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF
0.90%0.94%0.97%1.08%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIQ and VOO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIQ has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIQ dropped -14.87% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 19.42% vs 13.11% for SEIQ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 19.42% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SEIQ.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.90% for SEIQ.

SEIQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIQ and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIQ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer