SEIQ vs. USMV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SEIQ is actively managed, while USMV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIQ returned 12.04%/yr vs 10.83%/yr for USMV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

SEIQ vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIQ achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than USMV's 0.85% return.

SEIQ

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -3.40%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: -0.74%
• 1Y: 9.05%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USMV

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -2.38%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 4.28%
• 3Y*: 10.83%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIQ vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	-0.11%	12.51%	16.15%	22.66%	1.51%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	0.85%	7.65%	15.74%	10.33%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIQ and USMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.81

The correlation between SEIQ and USMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIQ vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEIQ	USMV
Technology	41.4%	33.9%
Consumer Cyclical	15.0%	5.7%
Industrials	9.8%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	9.4%
Healthcare	8.8%	12.6%
Communication Services	8.2%	6.2%
Financial Services	7.8%	11.7%
Basic Materials	0.9%	2.4%
Energy	-	2.7%
Real Estate	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	6.9%

Return for Risk

SEIQ vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 23
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

USMV

USMV Risk / Return Rank: 16
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIQ vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIQ	USMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	0.50	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	0.76	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.09	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	0.67	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	2.18	+1.46

SEIQ vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIQ and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEIQ vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and USMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIQ	USMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-33.10%	+18.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-6.46%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-9.36%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.63%	-2.91%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-2.87%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	1.97%	+0.52%

Volatility

SEIQ vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.62%. This indicates that SEIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIQ	USMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	2.62%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	6.13%	+2.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	8.61%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	12.36%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.60%	14.52%	+0.08%

SEIQ vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEIQ and USMV have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SEIQ vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than USMV's 1.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	0.95%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF	1.53%	1.49%	1.67%	1.82%	1.62%	1.26%	1.81%	1.88%	2.12%	1.77%	2.22%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIQ and USMV in my portfolio?

SEIQ and USMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEIQ or USMV?

SEIQ has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to USMV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIQ dropped -14.87% vs USMV's -33.10%.

Which ETF is better, SEIQ or USMV?

On 3-year performance, SEIQ leads with 12.04% vs 10.83% for USMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEIQ or USMV?

Over the 3-year period, SEIQ has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIQ or USMV?

SEIQ and USMV have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIQ or USMV?

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.95% for SEIQ.

What is the main difference between SEIQ and USMV?

They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.