SEIQ vs. FTIF
SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIQ is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by SEI, while FTIF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. SEIQ is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIQ returned 14.99%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for FTIF. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEIQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.
Performance
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIQ achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 22.67% return.
SEIQ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 16.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.55%
FTIF
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 22.67%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.49K | $76.24K | $51.93K | |
| $1.93M | $2.99M | $2.13M |
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF | 8.95% | 12.51% | 16.15% | 20.62% |
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 22.67% | 7.79% | 0.50% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIQ and FTIF is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SEIQ and FTIF has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEIQ
FTIF
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SEIQ
FTIF
Healthcare
SEIQ
FTIF
-
Consumer Defensive
SEIQ
FTIF
-
Financial Services
SEIQ
FTIF
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEIQ
FTIF
Industrials
SEIQ
FTIF
Communication Services
SEIQ
FTIF
-
Basic Materials
SEIQ
FTIF
Energy
SEIQ
-
FTIF
Real Estate
SEIQ
-
FTIF
Utilities
SEIQ
-
FTIF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIQ vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank
SEIQ
FTIF
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEIQ | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 4.90 | -3.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 14.17 | -7.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and FTIF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIQ | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -27.83% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -6.34% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -27.83% | +13.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.98% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -5.89% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.19% | +0.36% |
Volatility
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 3.03%. This indicates that SEIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIQ | FTIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 3.03% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 10.39% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 14.85% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 18.70% | -4.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 18.70% | -4.12% |
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIQ vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison
SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FTIF's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF | 1.09% | 1.45% | 2.88% | 1.55% | 0.00% |
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF | 0.88% | 0.94% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIQ and FTIF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIQ has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to FTIF (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIQ dropped -14.87% vs FTIF's -27.83%.
On 3-year performance, SEIQ leads with 14.99% vs 10.79% for FTIF. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIQ has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 10.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.88% for SEIQ.
SEIQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while FTIF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: SEI and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIQ and 0.60% for FTIF.
FTIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEIQ and FTIF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer