SEIM vs. SMOM
SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIM is a Momentum fund actively managed by SEI, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEIM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
SEIM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIM achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.82% return.
SEIM
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 7.63%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEIM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 18.91% | 4.45% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIM and SMOM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
SEIM
SMOM
SEIM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 1.45 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
SEIM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIM drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -7.45% | -14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -1.48% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | — | — |
Volatility
SEIM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 12.62% | +3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 12.62% | +6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 12.62% | +6.24% |
SEIM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
SEIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF | 0.52% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.89% | 1.01% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
SEIM has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SEIM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: SEI and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for SEIM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer