PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEI vs. MTSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SEI vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEI achieves a 61.67% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 121.78% return.


SEI

1D
-2.67%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
61.67%
6M
61.32%
1Y
175.46%
3Y*
112.03%
5Y*
53.72%
10Y*

MTSI

1D
1.36%
1M
1.14%
YTD
121.78%
6M
114.19%
1Y
194.54%
3Y*
82.85%
5Y*
44.69%
10Y*
26.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEI vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
61.67%62.29%277.66%-15.75%57.46%-15.55%-38.09%19.10%-43.06%75.35%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
121.78%31.85%39.76%47.59%-19.57%42.26%106.92%83.32%-55.41%-33.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SEI and MTSI is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2017

0.27

The correlation between SEI and MTSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SEI:

$3.66B

MTSI:

$29.30B

EPS

SEI:

$1.03

MTSI:

$2.33

PE Ratio

SEI:

72.19

MTSI:

163.18

PS Ratio

SEI:

4.83

MTSI:

26.86

PB Ratio

SEI:

4.69

MTSI:

20.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

SEI:

$692.11M

MTSI:

$1.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SEI:

$235.28M

MTSI:

$594.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

SEI:

$249.65M

MTSI:

$245.21M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEI vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEI
SEI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

MTSI
MTSI Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEI vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEIMTSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.39

9.54

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.09

24.62

-8.53

SEI vs. MTSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the MTSI Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEI and MTSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEI vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEI drawdown since its inception was -79.49%, roughly equal to the maximum MTSI drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEI and MTSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIMTSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.49%

-80.78%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.43%

-19.74%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.37%

-41.09%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.37%

-44.86%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-7.28%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-26.20%

-12.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

7.64%

+2.84%

Volatility

SEI vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison

Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc (SEI) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) have volatilities of 21.30% and 20.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIMTSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.30%

20.31%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.09%

40.72%

+12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.22%

50.86%

+22.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.77%

43.70%

+23.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.28%

52.43%

+9.85%

Dividends

SEI vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison

SEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while MTSI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc
0.65%1.04%1.67%5.65%4.23%6.41%5.16%2.89%0.83%

Financials

SEI vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
196.24M
288.96M
(SEI) Total Revenue
(MTSI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SEI vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
37.1%
56.9%
Portfolio components
SEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a gross profit of 72.72M and revenue of 196.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

MTSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.

SEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported an operating income of 50.56M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

MTSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

SEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc reported a net income of 21.44M and revenue of 196.24M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

MTSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SEI and MTSI have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEI has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to MTSI (20.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEI dropped -79.49% vs MTSI's -80.78%.

MTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEI and MTSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer