SEF vs. TSLQ
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SEF is passively managed, while TSLQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEF returned -10.66%/yr vs -68.13%/yr for TSLQ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
SEF vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than TSLQ's -3.74% return.
SEF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- -10.66%
- 5Y*
- -5.46%
- 10Y*
- -11.60%
TSLQ
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -7.45%
- 1Y
- -62.40%
- 3Y*
- -68.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 7.71% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | -7.12% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -3.74% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 63.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and TSLQ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.32 |
The correlation between SEF and TSLQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
TSLQ
SEF vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | -0.67 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | -0.84 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.91 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | -0.82 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | -1.05 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | -0.67 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.65 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -98.73% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -75.93% | +66.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -97.85% | +58.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.13% | -98.57% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.71% | -67.19% | -15.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 59.63% | -54.50% |
Volatility
SEF vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 2.92%, while AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 24.10% | -21.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 54.84% | -44.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 92.69% | -78.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 94.11% | -76.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 94.11% | -73.59% |
SEF vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than TSLQ's 10.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.38% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.97% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and TSLQ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (24.10%) compared to SEF (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.66% vs -68.13% for TSLQ. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.66% return vs -68.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.97%, compared with 3.38% for SEF.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 1.15% for TSLQ.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer