PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEF vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEF vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -11.50%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.01% annualized return.


SEF

1D
1.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
8.89%
6M
6.43%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
-10.34%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-11.50%

SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEF vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
8.89%-9.82%-17.81%-8.81%11.85%-27.02%-16.93%-23.51%10.34%-17.12%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SEF and SQQQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.64

The correlation between SEF and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SEF vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEF
SQQQ

Financial Services

65.0%
97.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SEF
65.0%
SQQQ
97.1%

Basic Materials

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Communication Services

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Energy

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Healthcare

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Industrials

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Real Estate

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Technology

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Utilities

SEF

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEF vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEF
SEF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEF vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEFSQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

-1.37

+1.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

-2.63

+3.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.72

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.99

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.73

-1.82

+2.55

SEF vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEF and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEFSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

-1.37

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

-0.74

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

-0.85

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.88

+0.39

Drawdowns

SEF vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEFSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.51%

-100.00%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-65.95%

+56.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.40%

-92.38%

+52.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.62%

-97.23%

+55.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.66%

-99.98%

+24.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.09%

-100.00%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.72%

-92.40%

+9.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

35.73%

-30.59%

Volatility

SEF vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 3.01%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEFSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

13.75%

-10.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

36.45%

-25.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

47.79%

-33.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

66.64%

-48.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

66.11%

-45.59%

SEF vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SEF and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

SEF vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEF
ProShares Short Financials
3.35%4.33%5.72%4.43%0.39%0.00%0.12%1.25%0.41%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEF and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SEF leads with -11.50% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SEF has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEF and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.

SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).

SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEF and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer