SEF vs. SQQQ
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -11.50%/yr vs -56.01%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SEF vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -11.50%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.01% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
SEF vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and SQQQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SEF and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEF vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SEF
SQQQ
Basic Materials
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
SEF
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
SQQQ
SEF vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | -1.37 | +1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | -2.63 | +3.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.72 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.99 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | -1.82 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | -1.37 | +1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | -0.74 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 | -0.85 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.88 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -100.00% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -65.95% | +56.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -92.38% | +52.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -97.23% | +55.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -99.98% | +24.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.09% | -100.00% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.72% | -92.40% | +9.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 35.73% | -30.59% |
Volatility
SEF vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 3.01%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 13.75% | -10.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 36.45% | -25.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 47.79% | -33.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 66.64% | -48.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 66.11% | -45.59% |
SEF vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SEF and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SEF vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than SQQQ's 12.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SEF leads with -11.50% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SEF has performed better with a -11.50% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer