SEF vs. METD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD).
SEF and METD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). It was launched on Jun 12, 2008. METD is an actively managed fund by Direxion. It was launched on Jun 5, 2024.
Performance
SEF vs. METD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SEF vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 11.27% | -9.82% | -12.40% |
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 12.25% | -17.33% | -15.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 12.25% return.
SEF
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 2.76%
- 3Y*
- -10.01%
- 5Y*
- -6.70%
- 10Y*
- -11.67%
METD
- 1D
- -6.54%
- 1M
- 11.62%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 23.48%
- 1Y
- -7.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEF vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
METD
SEF vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | -0.20 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.36 | 0.00 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.00 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | -0.19 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.11 | -0.27 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | -0.20 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.35 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and METD is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SEF vs. METD - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than METD's 2.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.27% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.43% | 3.35% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and METD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -46.03% | -50.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -39.89% | +19.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.00% | -27.85% | -68.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.58% | -28.04% | -54.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.44% | 29.13% | -14.69% |
Volatility
SEF vs. METD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.86%, while Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) has a volatility of 13.49%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 13.49% | -8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 26.76% | -15.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 40.30% | -21.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 36.27% | -18.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 36.27% | -15.72% |