SEF vs. KBWB
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while KBWB is a Financials Equities fund tracking the KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.45%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for KBWB. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWB.
Performance
SEF vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than KBWB's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed KBWB with an annualized return of -12.45%, while KBWB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- -2.58%
- 3Y*
- -12.09%
- 5Y*
- -6.78%
- 10Y*
- -12.45%
KBWB
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 9.33%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 40.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
SEF vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 2.80% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 12.95% | 32.05% | 36.73% | -1.18% | -21.68% | 37.72% | -10.46% | 35.90% | -18.30% | 18.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and KBWB is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011 | -0.89 |
The correlation between SEF and KBWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.89 to -0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEF vs. KBWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
KBWB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SEF
KBWB
Basic Materials
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Communication Services
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Energy
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Healthcare
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Industrials
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Real Estate
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Technology
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Utilities
SEF
-
KBWB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
KBWB
SEF vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.35 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.48 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 7.81 | -8.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than KBWB's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and KBWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -50.27% | -46.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -16.38% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -25.43% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -49.31% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -50.27% | -25.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.31% | 0.00% | -96.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.74% | -11.70% | -71.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 5.20% | -0.39% |
Volatility
SEF vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 4.04%, while Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | KBWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 5.65% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 15.89% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 20.26% | -5.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 26.55% | -8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 29.12% | -8.64% |
SEF vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than KBWB's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF | 1.97% | 2.04% | 2.46% | 3.20% | 3.05% | 2.13% | 2.62% | 2.38% | 2.54% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.54% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and KBWB have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBWB has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to SEF (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs KBWB's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, KBWB leads with 14.07% vs -12.45% for SEF. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 14.07% return vs -12.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.97% for KBWB.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while KBWB is Financials Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while KBWB tracks KBW Nasdaq Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.35% for KBWB.
KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and KBWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer