PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECR vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECR vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECR achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.


SECR

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.58%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDL

1D
8.25%
1M
135.69%
YTD
395.18%
6M
371.52%
1Y
1,189.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECR vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SECR
NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF
0.66%7.85%4.71%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
395.18%103.00%-56.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SECR and AMDL is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024

0.04

SECR vs. AMDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SECR
AMDL

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

66.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SECR
0.1%
AMDL

-

Basic Materials

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Communication Services

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Consumer Cyclical

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Consumer Defensive

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Energy

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Healthcare

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Industrials

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Real Estate

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Technology

SECR

-

AMDL
66.7%

Utilities

SECR

-

AMDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECR vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECR
SECR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SECR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SECR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECR vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECRAMDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.33

9.30

-7.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

4.81

-2.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.63

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

21.43

-19.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.40

42.08

-36.68

SECR vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECR Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 9.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECR and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECRAMDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

9.30

-7.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.56

+0.88

Drawdowns

SECR vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECR drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECR and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECRAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-88.63%

+84.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-56.13%

+53.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

0.00%

-1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-48.58%

+47.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

28.53%

-27.56%

Volatility

SECR vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) is 1.54%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that SECR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECRAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

46.02%

-44.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

94.09%

-91.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

129.41%

-125.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

116.59%

-111.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.63%

116.59%

-111.96%

SECR vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECR has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECR vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

SECR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SECR
NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF
6.28%6.68%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECR and AMDL have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to SECR (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECR dropped -3.93% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1189.78% vs 5.25% for SECR. On fees, SECR is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SECR has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1189.78% return vs 5.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SECR is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

SECR has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

SECR is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: NYLI and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SECR and 1.15% for AMDL.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECR and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer