SECR vs. MBSX
SECR (NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF) and MBSX (Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SECR returned 4.47% vs 12.52% for MBSX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SECR charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MBSX.
Performance
SECR vs. MBSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SECR achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than MBSX's 5.41% return.
SECR
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBSX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SECR vs. MBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SECR NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF | 0.62% | 3.82% |
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 5.41% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SECR and MBSX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SECR vs. MBSX — Risk / Return Rank
SECR
MBSX
SECR vs. MBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) and Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SECR | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 0.46 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 1.49 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SECR vs. MBSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SECR drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, smaller than the maximum MBSX drawdown of -27.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECR and MBSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SECR | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -27.57% | +23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -27.57% | +24.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -21.16% | +19.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -6.73% | +5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 8.40% | -7.36% |
Volatility
SECR vs. MBSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF (SECR) is 1.00%, while Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF (MBSX) has a volatility of 41.34%. This indicates that SECR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SECR | MBSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 41.34% | -40.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 52.02% | -49.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 54.91% | -50.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 54.69% | -50.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.61% | 54.69% | -50.08% |
SECR vs. MBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SECR has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than MBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SECR vs. MBSX - Dividend Comparison
SECR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than MBSX's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MBSX Regan Fixed Rate MBS ETF | 3.38% | 2.77% | 0.00% |
SECR NYLI MacKay Securitized Income ETF | 6.28% | 6.68% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SECR and MBSX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MBSX has higher volatility (41.34%) compared to SECR (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SECR dropped -3.93% vs MBSX's -27.57%.
On 1-year performance, MBSX leads with 12.52% vs 4.47% for SECR. On fees, SECR is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SECR has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MBSX has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 4.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SECR is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBSX.
SECR has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 3.38% for MBSX.
They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Regan. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SECR and 0.40% for MBSX.
SECR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SECR and MBSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer