SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS
SEC0.DE (iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and BITC.AS (CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - SEC0.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped, while BITC.AS is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. SEC0.DE is passively managed, while BITC.AS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEC0.DE returned 56.37%/yr vs 29.34%/yr for BITC.AS. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEC0.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BITC.AS.
Performance
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEC0.DE achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than BITC.AS's -27.10% return.
SEC0.DE
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- YTD
- 98.10%
- 6M
- 104.45%
- 1Y
- 185.19%
- 3Y*
- 56.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC.AS
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -19.17%
- YTD
- -27.10%
- 6M
- -28.56%
- 1Y
- -39.92%
- 3Y*
- 29.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 98.10% | 36.46% | 20.85% | 47.17% |
BITC.AS CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP | -27.10% | -17.17% | 136.40% | 82.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEC0.DE and BITC.AS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.29 |
The correlation between SEC0.DE and BITC.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS — Risk / Return Rank
SEC0.DE
BITC.AS
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEC0.DE | BITC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +7.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 0.84 | +0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.81 | -0.81 | +15.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 52.61 | -1.43 | +54.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.35%, smaller than the maximum BITC.AS drawdown of -49.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEC0.DE and BITC.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEC0.DE | BITC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.35% | -49.38% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -49.38% | +36.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.35% | -49.38% | +10.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | -48.60% | +45.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -13.07% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 28.31% | -24.67% |
Volatility
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) at 9.70%. This indicates that SEC0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEC0.DE | BITC.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 9.70% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.14% | 29.08% | -3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 39.42% | -7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 45.62% | -15.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.94% | 45.62% | -15.68% |
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEC0.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC.AS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEC0.DE vs. BITC.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEC0.DE nor BITC.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEC0.DE and BITC.AS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BITC.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITC.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEC0.DE.
SEC0.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while BITC.AS is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SEC0.DE and 0.25% for BITC.AS.
Find the right allocation for SEC0.DE and BITC.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer