PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC.AS vs. BTCW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BITC.AS is traded in EUR, while BTCW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTCW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BITC.AS having a -24.38% return and BTCW slightly lower at -24.49%.


BITC.AS

1D
-0.93%
1M
-16.10%
YTD
-24.38%
6M
-27.88%
1Y
-39.29%
3Y*
30.77%
5Y*
10Y*

BTCW

1D
-2.41%
1M
-17.80%
YTD
-24.49%
6M
-29.43%
1Y
-39.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITC.AS
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP
-24.38%-17.17%115.20%
BTCW
Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund
-24.49%-17.20%111.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC.AS and BTCW is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.74

The correlation between BITC.AS and BTCW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC.AS vs. BTCW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC.AS
BITC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCW
BTCW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITC.ASBTCWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.85

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.81

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-1.41

+0.02

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the BTCW Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC.AS and BTCW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITC.ASBTCWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

-0.93

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.25

+0.48

Drawdowns

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC.AS drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCW drawdown of -49.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC.AS and BTCW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITC.ASBTCWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-49.57%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-49.57%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.68%

-47.52%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-16.42%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.15%

28.28%

-0.13%

Volatility

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and Wisdom Tree Bitcoin Fund (BTCW) have volatilities of 9.34% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITC.ASBTCWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

9.32%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.82%

34.05%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.38%

43.22%

-3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.62%

50.09%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.62%

50.09%

-4.47%

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCW's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITC.AS vs. BTCW - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITC.AS nor BTCW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC.AS and BTCW have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BITC.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BITC.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BTCW.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BITC.AS and 0.30% for BTCW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC.AS and BTCW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer