PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC.AS achieves a -24.38% return, which is significantly higher than CDOT.DE's -37.05% return.


BITC.AS

1D
-0.93%
1M
-16.10%
YTD
-24.38%
6M
-27.88%
1Y
-39.29%
3Y*
30.77%
5Y*
10Y*

CDOT.DE

1D
2.61%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
-37.05%
6M
-50.39%
1Y
-72.75%
3Y*
-39.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITC.AS
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP
-24.38%-17.17%136.40%79.86%
CDOT.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP
-37.05%-75.15%-10.53%33.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BITC.AS and CDOT.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023

0.69

The correlation between BITC.AS and CDOT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC.AS
BITC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CDOT.DE
CDOT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CDOT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITC.ASCDOT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.78

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.97

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-1.48

+0.09

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the CDOT.DE Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC.AS and CDOT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITC.ASCDOT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

-1.00

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

-0.59

+1.32

Drawdowns

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC.AS drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, smaller than the maximum CDOT.DE drawdown of -94.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC.AS and CDOT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITC.ASCDOT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-94.53%

+45.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-75.24%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.38%

-90.42%

+41.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.68%

-94.38%

+47.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-70.85%

+57.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.15%

49.04%

-20.89%

Volatility

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) is 9.34%, while CoinShares Physical Staked Polkadot EUR ETP (CDOT.DE) has a volatility of 16.51%. This indicates that BITC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDOT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITC.ASCDOT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

16.51%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.82%

51.83%

-22.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.38%

72.57%

-33.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.62%

77.58%

-31.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.62%

77.58%

-31.96%

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CDOT.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BITC.AS vs. CDOT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITC.AS nor CDOT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BITC.AS and CDOT.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CDOT.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CDOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for BITC.AS.

Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BITC.AS and 0.00% for CDOT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITC.AS and CDOT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer