SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L).
SEC0.DE and EQQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEC0.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. It was launched on Aug 5, 2021. EQQQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Dec 2, 2002. Both SEC0.DE and EQQQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SEC0.DE or EQQQ.L.
Key characteristics
| SEC0.DE | EQQQ.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.09% | 25.14% |
| 1Y Return | 33.15% | 31.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.91% | 11.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.14 | 1.91 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.25 | 2.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.14 | 7.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.09% | 4.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.59% | 15.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.91% | -33.75% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.22% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEC0.DE and EQQQ.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SEC0.DE achieves a 19.09% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 25.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEC0.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
SEC0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% | 1.01% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEC0.DE and EQQQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SEC0.DE vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.36%. This indicates that SEC0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.