PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BITC.AS
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP
-21.60%-17.17%136.40%79.86%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
-2.67%3.66%33.47%18.59%
Different Trading Currencies

BITC.AS is traded in EUR, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC.AS achieves a -21.60% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's -2.67% return.


BITC.AS

1D
1.74%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-21.60%
6M
-40.99%
1Y
-24.70%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
10Y*

VUAG.L

1D
2.16%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
0.35%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC.AS
BITC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITC.ASVUAG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.61

0.62

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.68

0.93

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.14

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

1.32

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.95

4.31

-5.26

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC.AS and VUAG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITC.ASVUAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

0.62

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.84

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between BITC.AS and VUAG.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITC.AS nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BITC.AS
CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%

Drawdowns

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC.AS drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC.AS and VUAG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITC.ASVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-25.61%

-23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-10.53%

-38.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.72%

-4.74%

-39.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-3.57%

-8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.13%

2.08%

+21.05%

Volatility

BITC.AS vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BTC) ETP (BITC.AS) has a higher volatility of 12.64% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 4.09%. This indicates that BITC.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITC.ASVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.64%

4.09%

+8.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.32%

8.60%

+23.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.10%

16.75%

+23.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.04%

15.15%

+30.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.04%

36.83%

+9.21%