PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEA vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEA vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 21.42% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


SEA

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
21.42%
6M
20.68%
1Y
31.28%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.00%
1M
3.39%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.02%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
20.03%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEA vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
21.42%16.78%2.52%19.33%-17.28%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%31.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SEA and YCS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2022

-0.13

The correlation between SEA and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEA vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEAYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

4.23

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.96

13.22

-1.26

SEA vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEAYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.06

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.33

+0.07

Drawdowns

SEA vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEAYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-49.56%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-8.30%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.42%

-23.05%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

0.00%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-19.93%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.65%

-0.03%

Volatility

SEA vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.62%. This indicates that SEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEAYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

2.62%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

12.31%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

17.18%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

21.09%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

19.01%

+2.65%

SEA vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEA vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.56%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEA and YCS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEA has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to YCS (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEA dropped -39.53% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 20.03% vs 19.14% for SEA. On fees, SEA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 20.03% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

SEA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: US Global and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEA and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEA and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer