PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEA vs. VBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEA vs. VBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEA achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than VBIL's 1.70% return.


SEA

1D
2.29%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
20.42%
6M
20.07%
1Y
30.14%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
10Y*

VBIL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEA vs. VBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SEA and VBIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEA vs. VBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEA
SEA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEA vs. VBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEAVBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-109.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

39.66

-38.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

296.41

-293.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

1,809.33

-1,797.88

SEA vs. VBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the VBIL Sharpe Ratio of 18.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEA and VBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEA vs. VBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEA drawdown since its inception was -39.53%, which is greater than VBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEA and VBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEAVBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.53%

-0.09%

-39.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-0.01%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

0.00%

-3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.18%

-0.00%

-14.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.00%

+2.64%

Volatility

SEA vs. VBIL - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF (SEA) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that SEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEAVBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

0.05%

+5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

0.16%

+12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.56%

0.22%

+16.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

0.30%

+21.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

0.30%

+21.35%

SEA vs. VBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIL's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEA vs. VBIL - Dividend Comparison

SEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than VBIL's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SEA
U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
5.61%6.76%18.47%9.85%18.73%
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEA and VBIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEA has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VBIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEA dropped -39.53% vs VBIL's -0.09%.

On 1-year performance, SEA leads with 30.14% vs 3.91% for VBIL. On fees, VBIL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SEA has performed better with a 30.14% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBIL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SEA.

SEA has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.

SEA is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VBIL is Ultrashort Bond. SEA tracks U.S. Global Sea to Sky Cargo Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEA and 0.07% for VBIL.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.07 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEA and VBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer