PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SE vs. MNSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SE vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sea Limited (SE) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SE achieves a -34.98% return, which is significantly lower than MNSO's -28.13% return.


SE

1D
-3.21%
1M
-11.31%
YTD
-34.98%
6M
-33.66%
1Y
-46.36%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
-21.47%
10Y*

MNSO

1D
-0.38%
1M
-11.56%
YTD
-28.13%
6M
-31.03%
1Y
-25.72%
3Y*
-5.77%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SE vs. MNSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SE
Sea Limited
-34.98%20.24%161.98%-22.16%-76.74%12.39%18.74%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-28.13%-18.93%20.92%93.11%6.38%-60.35%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SE and MNSO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.29

The correlation between SE and MNSO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SE:

$52.76B

MNSO:

$4.03B

EPS

SE:

$2.57

MNSO:

CN¥6.65

PE Ratio

SE:

32.21

MNSO:

13.40

PEG Ratio

SE:

0.15

MNSO:

0.08

PS Ratio

SE:

2.06

MNSO:

1.21

PB Ratio

SE:

4.11

MNSO:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

SE:

$25.19B

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SE:

$11.15B

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

SE:

$2.33B

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SE vs. MNSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SE
SE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SE vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sea Limited (SE) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEMNSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.50

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

-0.94

-0.33

SE vs. MNSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SE Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the MNSO Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SE and MNSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SE vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SE drawdown since its inception was -90.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MNSO drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SE and MNSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMNSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.51%

-86.58%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.22%

-51.47%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.22%

-54.05%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.51%

-80.24%

-10.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.40%

-56.44%

-20.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.10%

-45.53%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.57%

27.33%

+9.24%

Volatility

SE vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison

Sea Limited (SE) has a higher volatility of 14.69% compared to MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) at 9.60%. This indicates that SE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMNSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.69%

9.60%

+5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.05%

23.05%

+15.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.74%

39.85%

+10.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.13%

67.13%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.59%

68.59%

-6.00%

Dividends

SE vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison

SE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.06%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%
SE
Sea Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SE vs. MNSO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sea Limited and MINISO Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
7.10B
5.65B
(SE) Total Revenue
(MNSO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SE values in USD, MNSO values in CNY

SE vs. MNSO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sea Limited and MINISO Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
44.3%
43.3%
Portfolio components
SE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a gross profit of 3.15B and revenue of 7.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

SE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported an operating income of 565.39M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

SE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sea Limited reported a net income of 427.94M and revenue of 7.10B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SE and MNSO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SE has higher volatility (14.69%) compared to MNSO (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SE dropped -90.51% vs MNSO's -86.58%.

MNSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SE and MNSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer