PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDTY vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDTY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDTY achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.


SDTY

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.38%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDTY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDTY and QYLD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025

0.80

The correlation between SDTY and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDTY vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDTY
QYLD

Technology

35.6%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.2%

Industrials

8.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.4%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

SDTY
35.6%
QYLD
53.8%

Financial Services

SDTY
11.8%
QYLD
0.2%

Communication Services

SDTY
11.2%
QYLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SDTY
10.1%
QYLD
12.3%

Healthcare

SDTY
8.5%
QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

SDTY
8.3%
QYLD
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SDTY
4.9%
QYLD
7.7%

Energy

SDTY
3.5%
QYLD
0.6%

Utilities

SDTY
2.4%
QYLD
1.4%

Real Estate

SDTY
1.9%
QYLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

SDTY
1.8%
QYLD
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDTY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDTY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDTYQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.63

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.84

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.58

28.36

-14.78

SDTY vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDTY and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDTYQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.80

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Drawdowns

SDTY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDTY drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDTY and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDTYQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.63%

-24.75%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-4.97%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.06%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-3.84%

+0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

0.85%

+1.04%

Volatility

SDTY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that SDTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDTYQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

1.85%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

7.12%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

8.58%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

14.70%

+2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

15.49%

+1.30%

SDTY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDTY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.97%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
SDTY
YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
25.97%22.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDTY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDTY has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDTY dropped -18.63% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 1-year performance, SDTY leads with 25.63% vs 23.93% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SDTY has performed better with a 25.63% return vs 23.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.

SDTY has the higher dividend yield at 25.97%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

SDTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SDTY and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDTY and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer