PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDTY vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SDTY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SDTY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDTY achieves a -4.13% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's -5.34% return.


SDTY

1D
1.89%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-0.63%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
2.12%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
-5.34%
6M
-1.02%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SDTY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SDTY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDTY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDTYQDTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.05

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.42

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.39

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

5.36

-0.95

SDTY vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDTY and QDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDTYQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.05

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.76

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between SDTY and QDTE is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SDTY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

SDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.16%, less than QDTE's 51.06% yield.


Drawdowns

SDTY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDTY drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDTY and QDTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SDTYQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.63%

-22.86%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.98%

-14.08%

+2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-8.29%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-3.30%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.65%

-0.60%

Volatility

SDTY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) is 4.75%, while Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that SDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SDTYQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

5.64%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

12.02%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

19.33%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

18.70%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

18.70%

-1.19%