PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDTY vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDTY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDTY achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


SDTY

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.38%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDTY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SDTY and AMDW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.50

SDTY vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SDTY
AMDW

Technology

35.6%
28.6%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

SDTY
35.6%
AMDW
28.6%

Financial Services

SDTY
11.8%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

SDTY
11.2%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

SDTY
10.1%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

SDTY
8.5%
AMDW

-

Industrials

SDTY
8.3%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

SDTY
4.9%
AMDW

-

Energy

SDTY
3.5%
AMDW

-

Utilities

SDTY
2.4%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

SDTY
1.9%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

SDTY
1.8%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDTY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDTY
SDTY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDTY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDTYAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.58

SDTY vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDTYAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

4.83

-3.98

Drawdowns

SDTY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDTY drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDTY and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDTYAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.63%

-34.64%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-14.66%

+11.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

SDTY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDTYAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

81.56%

-70.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

81.56%

-64.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

81.56%

-64.77%

SDTY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDTY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

SDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.97%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SDTY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SDTY.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 25.97% for SDTY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SDTY and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDTY and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer