SDS vs. RTXG
SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDS is passively managed, while RTXG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RTXG.
Performance
SDS vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SDS having a -17.06% return and RTXG slightly higher at -16.61%.
SDS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- -17.06%
- 6M
- -16.53%
- 1Y
- -34.59%
- 3Y*
- -28.79%
- 5Y*
- -21.98%
- 10Y*
- -27.72%
RTXG
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -16.61%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDS vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | -17.06% | -20.47% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | -16.61% | 60.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDS and RTXG is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDS vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank
SDS
RTXG
SDS vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDS | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDS | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 0.72 | -1.38 |
Drawdowns
SDS vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and RTXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDS | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -37.49% | -62.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | -36.25% | -63.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -8.66% | -74.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.51% | — | — |
Volatility
SDS vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDS | RTXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.58% | 48.66% | -25.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 48.66% | -15.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 48.66% | -12.84% |
SDS vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDS vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison
SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than RTXG's 7.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 7.63% | 6.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | 5.79% | 5.88% | 7.89% | 5.77% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDS and RTXG have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for SDS.
RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 5.79% for SDS.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 0.75% for RTXG.
Find the right allocation for SDS and RTXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer