PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTXG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTXG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTXG achieves a -8.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.41% return.


RTXG

1D
-4.49%
1M
3.75%
YTD
-8.90%
6M
-11.14%
1Y
30.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.96%
YTD
20.41%
6M
19.46%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
22.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTXG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RTXG
Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF
-8.90%60.90%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.41%17.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RTXG and QQQ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTXG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTXG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTXGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.41

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

3.44

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

12.79

-10.72

RTXG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTXG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTXG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.49%

-82.97%

+45.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.49%

-11.96%

-25.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.36%

-0.99%

-29.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-32.73%

+23.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.90%

3.21%

+11.69%

Volatility

RTXG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) has a higher volatility of 18.26% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.47%. This indicates that RTXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.26%

8.47%

+9.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.42%

14.20%

+24.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.86%

17.67%

+32.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.06%

22.64%

+27.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.06%

22.43%

+27.63%

RTXG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTXG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.49%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
RTXG
Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF
6.98%6.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTXG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTXG has higher volatility (18.26%) compared to QQQ (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTXG dropped -37.49% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 1-year performance, QQQ leads with 40.91% vs 30.73% for RTXG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 40.91% return vs 30.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RTXG.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 0.49% for QQQ.

RTXG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RTXG and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTXG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer