SDS vs. MUU
SDS (ProShares UltraShort S&P500) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SDS is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, SDS returned -34.59% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. SDS charges 0.91%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
SDS vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDS achieves a -17.06% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.
SDS
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- -17.06%
- 6M
- -16.53%
- 1Y
- -34.59%
- 3Y*
- -28.79%
- 5Y*
- -21.98%
- 10Y*
- -27.72%
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDS vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | -17.06% | -26.79% | -2.14% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDS and MUU is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.54 |
The correlation between SDS and MUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.54 to -0.48 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDS vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
SDS
MUU
SDS vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -51.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.91 | -1.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 125.85 | -126.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 426.84 | -428.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | 50.40 | -51.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 6.68 | -7.34 |
Drawdowns
SDS vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDS and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -75.07% | -24.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.20% | -52.72% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.85% | 0.00% | -99.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -23.44% | -59.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.51% | 15.51% | +5.00% |
Volatility
SDS vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS) is 5.59%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that SDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDS | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 54.78% | -49.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.81% | 105.07% | -87.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.58% | 131.77% | -108.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 133.67% | -100.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 133.67% | -97.85% |
SDS vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDS has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDS vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
SDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDS ProShares UltraShort S&P500 | 5.79% | 5.88% | 7.89% | 5.77% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDS and MUU have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to SDS (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDS dropped -99.85% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs -34.59% for SDS. On fees, SDS is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, SDS has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs -34.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDS is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
SDS has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for SDS and 1.06% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDS and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer