SDOG vs. RFCI
SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) and RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while RFCI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by SS&C. SDOG is passively managed, while RFCI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDOG returned 8.48%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for RFCI. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SDOG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for RFCI.
Performance
SDOG vs. RFCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDOG achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than RFCI's 0.13% return.
SDOG
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 14.21%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 24.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
RFCI
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
SDOG vs. RFCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 14.21% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 0.13% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SDOG and RFCI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2016 | 0.04 |
The correlation between SDOG and RFCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SDOG vs. RFCI — Risk / Return Rank
SDOG
RFCI
SDOG vs. RFCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) and RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 1.74 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 5.23 | +7.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.31 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.24 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.42 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
SDOG vs. RFCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDOG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than RFCI's maximum drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDOG and RFCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -14.18% | -29.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.24% | -2.65% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -5.10% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.84% | -13.46% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -1.38% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -3.23% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.88% | +1.06% |
Volatility
SDOG vs. RFCI - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) at 1.29%. This indicates that SDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SDOG | RFCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 1.29% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 2.70% | +5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.42% | 3.53% | +7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 5.13% | +10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 4.95% | +14.11% |
SDOG vs. RFCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDOG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RFCI's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
SDOG vs. RFCI - Dividend Comparison
SDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than RFCI's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.54% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.35% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SDOG and RFCI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SDOG has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to RFCI (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDOG dropped -43.56% vs RFCI's -14.18%.
On 5-year performance, SDOG leads with 8.48% vs 1.22% for RFCI. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RFCI has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SDOG has performed better with a 8.48% return vs 1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.
RFCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.35% for SDOG.
SDOG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RFCI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SDOG and 0.54% for RFCI.
SDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SDOG and RFCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer