RFCI vs. BFOR
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR).
RFCI and BFOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. BFOR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Barron's 400 Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013.
Performance
RFCI vs. BFOR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCI vs. BFOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.21% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.80% | 13.85% | 17.81% | 18.19% | -15.92% | 30.71% | 17.60% | 21.30% | -13.86% | 19.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than BFOR's 0.80% return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
BFOR
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCI vs. BFOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BFOR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. BFOR — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
BFOR
RFCI vs. BFOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCI | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.55 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.63 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 6.88 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCI | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.46 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and BFOR is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFCI vs. BFOR - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BFOR's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.51% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.59% | 0.60% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. BFOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum BFOR drawdown of -41.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and BFOR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -41.27% | +27.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -12.75% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -25.93% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -6.79% | +5.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -6.49% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 3.02% | -2.21% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. BFOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.54%, while ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | BFOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 5.74% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 11.41% | -8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 19.99% | -15.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 19.44% | -14.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 20.41% | -15.45% |